Heute Ankündigung des ARP, bin guter Dinge !
Top-News
Neuester,
zuletzt geles. Beitrag
Antworten | Börsenforum Übersicht
Zurück
Weiter
... 2470 2471 2473 2474 ...
Antworten | Börsenforum Übersicht
Zurück
Weiter ... 2470 2471 2473 2474 ...
Wirecard 2014 - 2025
Beiträge: 180.977
Zugriffe: 45.797.159 / Heute: 35.736
Zugriffe: 45.797.159 / Heute: 35.736
|
Werbung
Entdecke die beliebtesten ETFs von Xtrackers
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1D
Perf. 12M: +155,87%
Xtrackers MSCI Pakistan Swap UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +68,36%
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +57,05%
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +53,56%
Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D
Perf. 12M: +51,49%
Die FT hat vorhin einen neuen Artikel abgefeuert.
Das riecht nach einer üblen Attacke seitens der LV.
Das riecht nach einer üblen Attacke seitens der LV.
www.ft.com/content/f4a89186-f0eb-11e9-ad1e-4367d8281195
Wirecard: the unanswered questions
German fintech company’s rebuttal of the FT’s reporting leaves unanswered questions
After the Financial Times published an in-depth examination of suspect accounting at Wirecard this week, the high-flying German fintech published a rebuttal that left many observers with further questions.
The FT had published internal correspondence which appeared to show a concerted effort to inflate sales and profits for subsidiaries in Dubai and Dublin, and shares in the Dax 30 group tumbled.
With calls growing for an independent review of the audit work conducted by EY, the FT sought clarification of points made in Wirecard’s Wednesday statement, which seemed to reverse its previous position that documents cited by the FT were fake.
Wirecard said it would not provide answers before the end of this week. In the absence of any available clarificatory responses, the questions are reproduced here.
Clients versus client clusters
At the heart of the matter are the names of 34 companies. Internal financial reports appeared to attribute substantial profits to payments processed for these companies on behalf of Wirecard by a third-party: a Dubai business called Al Alam Solutions.
I’ve never used that process, I’ve never heard them talk to me about it, I’ve never heard of it during my career
Whistleblower
The FT found that eight of the 34 companies had shut down by the time their names appeared next to monthly financial data for transactions and sales in 2017. A further 15 of the 34 told the FT they had never heard of Al Alam, of which four said they did do business with Wirecard in the period concerned. Six did not respond or declined to comment, and five could not be traced.
Wirecard’s statement said “the 34 company names mentioned by the Financial Times refer to labels of customer clusters created for reporting and reconciliation purposes, each containing hundreds of individual genuine merchants. The conclusions drawn by the Financial Times are therefore not correct”.
Whistleblowers with experience of Wirecard operations in multiple countries said they were unaware of any practice of using aliases to mask client identities in financial reports.
One whistleblower said “why would ‘cluster’ names have the same name as an actual company? Yes, there were code words for projects but I never heard of code words for company clusters”.
Another whistleblower said that they had never heard Edo Kurniawan — Wirecard’s former head of international reporting, who was a party to the correspondence published by the FT this week — refer to the practice. “I’ve never used that process, I’ve never heard them talk to me about it, I’ve never heard of it during my career,” the whistleblower said.
The FT sought on Wednesday to understand why such aliases would be used to refer to clusters of clients in the documents it had published. The FT asked the company:
“If Wirecard maintains that its statement (which some may find implausible) to the market today is correct, please explain the company’s use of names both of defunct companies — such as Cymix, Piku, and Molotok — and existing Wirecard customers — such as CCBill, 1XBet, and Allied Wallet — to disguise the identity of clients or clusters of clients.”
The FT also asked why large numbers of clients names were not disguised by aliases in other parts of a document, which had been partially redacted by the FT prior to publication.
Dubai clarity
Wirecard’s statement said its Dubai operations employ nearly 200 staff, constitute a global product and service delivery hub, and hold contractual agreements with customers and various partners. “Revenues generated from customers contracted via Dubai contributed nearly 32 per cent of global revenues in FY2018,” it said.
Recommended
This week’s FT story built on one published in April, which reported that half of Wirecard’s revenues in 2016, and almost all of its profits, appeared to come from a relationship with three partner companies. Al Alam was the largest of those, followed by PayEasy Solutions, a Philippine payment processor whose registered office in Manilla was shared with a bus company, and the Senjo group in Singapore.
At the time Markus Braun, Wirecard’s chief executive, said the figures cited by the FT were not accurate. The FT has asked Wirecard what share of its overall transaction volumes and revenues were attributed to Al Alam, Senjo and PayEasy in 2016.
Following Wirecard’s statement on Wednesday, the FT also asked who it has appointed to audit its Dubai businesses.
What can Al Alam do, which Wirecard can’t?
Wirecard’s statement said Al Alam is “one of multiple such independent partners” it works with in the UAE, “providing access to a multitude of payment methods”. The company said it “relies on such partners for the processing of transactions requiring particular payment methods or the involvement of locally licensed financial institutions”.
Al Alam has said it operates lawfully and was not involved in any alleged process to fake revenues or profits at Wirecard.
The FT has asked Wirecard to name other independent partners it works with in the UAE, and to specify which payment methods Wirecard does not support which require a third-party processor.
As Visa and Mastercard do not license Al Alam, Wirecard was also asked to specify the payment methods Al Alam was able to process, and the licences it held.
German fintech company’s rebuttal of the FT’s reporting leaves unanswered questions
After the Financial Times published an in-depth examination of suspect accounting at Wirecard this week, the high-flying German fintech published a rebuttal that left many observers with further questions.
The FT had published internal correspondence which appeared to show a concerted effort to inflate sales and profits for subsidiaries in Dubai and Dublin, and shares in the Dax 30 group tumbled.
With calls growing for an independent review of the audit work conducted by EY, the FT sought clarification of points made in Wirecard’s Wednesday statement, which seemed to reverse its previous position that documents cited by the FT were fake.
Wirecard said it would not provide answers before the end of this week. In the absence of any available clarificatory responses, the questions are reproduced here.
Clients versus client clusters
At the heart of the matter are the names of 34 companies. Internal financial reports appeared to attribute substantial profits to payments processed for these companies on behalf of Wirecard by a third-party: a Dubai business called Al Alam Solutions.
I’ve never used that process, I’ve never heard them talk to me about it, I’ve never heard of it during my career
Whistleblower
The FT found that eight of the 34 companies had shut down by the time their names appeared next to monthly financial data for transactions and sales in 2017. A further 15 of the 34 told the FT they had never heard of Al Alam, of which four said they did do business with Wirecard in the period concerned. Six did not respond or declined to comment, and five could not be traced.
Wirecard’s statement said “the 34 company names mentioned by the Financial Times refer to labels of customer clusters created for reporting and reconciliation purposes, each containing hundreds of individual genuine merchants. The conclusions drawn by the Financial Times are therefore not correct”.
Whistleblowers with experience of Wirecard operations in multiple countries said they were unaware of any practice of using aliases to mask client identities in financial reports.
One whistleblower said “why would ‘cluster’ names have the same name as an actual company? Yes, there were code words for projects but I never heard of code words for company clusters”.
Another whistleblower said that they had never heard Edo Kurniawan — Wirecard’s former head of international reporting, who was a party to the correspondence published by the FT this week — refer to the practice. “I’ve never used that process, I’ve never heard them talk to me about it, I’ve never heard of it during my career,” the whistleblower said.
The FT sought on Wednesday to understand why such aliases would be used to refer to clusters of clients in the documents it had published. The FT asked the company:
“If Wirecard maintains that its statement (which some may find implausible) to the market today is correct, please explain the company’s use of names both of defunct companies — such as Cymix, Piku, and Molotok — and existing Wirecard customers — such as CCBill, 1XBet, and Allied Wallet — to disguise the identity of clients or clusters of clients.”
The FT also asked why large numbers of clients names were not disguised by aliases in other parts of a document, which had been partially redacted by the FT prior to publication.
Dubai clarity
Wirecard’s statement said its Dubai operations employ nearly 200 staff, constitute a global product and service delivery hub, and hold contractual agreements with customers and various partners. “Revenues generated from customers contracted via Dubai contributed nearly 32 per cent of global revenues in FY2018,” it said.
Recommended
This week’s FT story built on one published in April, which reported that half of Wirecard’s revenues in 2016, and almost all of its profits, appeared to come from a relationship with three partner companies. Al Alam was the largest of those, followed by PayEasy Solutions, a Philippine payment processor whose registered office in Manilla was shared with a bus company, and the Senjo group in Singapore.
At the time Markus Braun, Wirecard’s chief executive, said the figures cited by the FT were not accurate. The FT has asked Wirecard what share of its overall transaction volumes and revenues were attributed to Al Alam, Senjo and PayEasy in 2016.
Following Wirecard’s statement on Wednesday, the FT also asked who it has appointed to audit its Dubai businesses.
What can Al Alam do, which Wirecard can’t?
Wirecard’s statement said Al Alam is “one of multiple such independent partners” it works with in the UAE, “providing access to a multitude of payment methods”. The company said it “relies on such partners for the processing of transactions requiring particular payment methods or the involvement of locally licensed financial institutions”.
Al Alam has said it operates lawfully and was not involved in any alleged process to fake revenues or profits at Wirecard.
The FT has asked Wirecard to name other independent partners it works with in the UAE, and to specify which payment methods Wirecard does not support which require a third-party processor.
As Visa and Mastercard do not license Al Alam, Wirecard was also asked to specify the payment methods Al Alam was able to process, and the licences it held.
Was schreibt die FT diesmal. Unbeantwortete Frage? Was für eine schöne Überschrift. Kann jemand etwas zum Inhalt sagen?
Kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass das heute eine allzu große Bewegung im Kurs verursachen sollte.
Hier ein Beitrag von Nega_L2 im WO Forum. Er hat seine Informationen von der IR Abteilung, bei der er gestern anrief.
Ich habe heute erfahren, dass das ARP erst in den nächsten Wochen kommt. Alexander von Knoob hatte auf dem dem Innovation Day in NY von "next week" gesprochen. Das war wohl ein Versprecher. Unschön natürlich. Dies könnte zu Enttäuschung Ende der Woche führen, da die meisten bis Ende der Woche mit einer Ankündigung rechnen.
Darüber hinaus habe ich auch erfahren, dass die Dokumente (Excel sheets, Chatauszüge) nicht von einem Wistleblower stammen, sondern man vermutet, dass das Email Postfach eines Mitarbeiters gehackt wurde. Sie sind also echt, jedoch irreführend in Bezug auf die Interpretation seitens der FT. De facto ist das aus meiner Sicht auch irrelevant woher sie stammen. Die Beweiskraft für die Anschuldigungen ist gleich 0.
Wirecard - Top oder Flop | wallstreet-online.de - Vollständige Diskussion unter:
www.wallstreet-online.de/diskussion/...wirecard-top-oder-flop
Großartig dass man sich immer wieder auf journalistischen Quellenschutz zurückziehen kann und das Wort „whistleblower“ recht dominant verwendet wird?!
Ok das macht mich stutzig. Mein Englisch ist jetzt nicht das Beste, aber steht da was neues drin?
Ich bin eig. von einer neuen Attacke heute fast ausgegangen. Jetzt kommt der Artikel, aber außerbörslich. Einerseits kann es trotzdem gleich zu einer Attacke kommen, andererseits ist der so dünn dass ich mich eig. bekräftigt fühle nicht vorschnell zu handeln, da anscheinend nichts "Schlimmes" mehr nachkommt.
Was meint ihr wird gleich auf dem Markt passieren?
Ich bin eig. von einer neuen Attacke heute fast ausgegangen. Jetzt kommt der Artikel, aber außerbörslich. Einerseits kann es trotzdem gleich zu einer Attacke kommen, andererseits ist der so dünn dass ich mich eig. bekräftigt fühle nicht vorschnell zu handeln, da anscheinend nichts "Schlimmes" mehr nachkommt.
Was meint ihr wird gleich auf dem Markt passieren?
weil die sind alle Mist. Aber wenn wieder gedrückt wird kann, in dem Artikel auch wieder nur bla bla bla stehen. Ich hoffe das es hier zu keien grösseren Rücksetzern kommt. Mal sehen.
Nichts drin ...nur neuzusammengefügt wie wine Protokollierung der Woche ..dafür hätte es früher im Aufsatz ne 6 gegeben.
Kommt heute ein Telefon Call oder nicht?
Kommt heute ein Telefon Call oder nicht?
Sondern die Leerverkäufer.
Vieleicht schmeißen sie jetzt alle bei L&S und drücken den Kurs auf 1€ oder so.
Vieleicht schmeißen sie jetzt alle bei L&S und drücken den Kurs auf 1€ oder so.
Möglicherweise ist das nur die Ouvertüre...und der Hauptakt folgt?!
Bei dem Burschen ist bekanntlich rein gar nichts auszuschließen!
Bei dem Burschen ist bekanntlich rein gar nichts auszuschließen!
Ich gehe einmal vom Schlimmsten aus und rechne heute mit einer weiteren Short-Attacke
1) Es gibt wieder einen gefakten FT-Artikel
2) Die BaFin ist durch den Brexit gebunden und hat kaum noch Ressourcen, deshalb gab es diese Woche die Short-Attacke, da die BaFin einen "Notfall-Plan" für den Hard Brexit ausgearbeitet hat => freies Spielfeld für die Leerverkäufer, die BaFin schaut wie immer weg
3) Die unsicheren Hände werden wieder mehr, es ist Freitag (kein guter Tag für Wirecard) und die asiatischen Börsen sind auch rot
1) Es gibt wieder einen gefakten FT-Artikel
2) Die BaFin ist durch den Brexit gebunden und hat kaum noch Ressourcen, deshalb gab es diese Woche die Short-Attacke, da die BaFin einen "Notfall-Plan" für den Hard Brexit ausgearbeitet hat => freies Spielfeld für die Leerverkäufer, die BaFin schaut wie immer weg
3) Die unsicheren Hände werden wieder mehr, es ist Freitag (kein guter Tag für Wirecard) und die asiatischen Börsen sind auch rot
persönlich ins Gesicht schreien, anders scheint ihr es nicht zu kapieren. Die „news“ haben absolut 0 Einfluss auf den Kurs. Er soll nur von der eigentlichen Kursmanipulation ablenken. Wann um himmelswillen begreift ihr das.
Zum Wochenende Angst machen und die Leute rauskicken, nur wundert es mich dass es vorbörslicher ist, in der Vergangenheit war es I. D. R Freitag nach börsenschluss
an den Anschuldigungen von der FT ist laut Staatsanwaltschaft und BaFin nichts dran und Wirecard ist Opfer von Markmanipulationen und es wird gegen unbekannt ermittelt.
Ich finde eine sehr gute Basis für steigende Kurse!
Ich finde eine sehr gute Basis für steigende Kurse!
so komisch gelaufen. Der wurde regelrecht in Abschussposition gebracht.
|
Neueste Beiträge aus dem Wirecard Forum
| Wertung | Antworten | Thema | Verfasser | letzter Verfasser | letzter Beitrag | |
189 | 180.976 | Wirecard 2014 - 2025 | Byblos | Meimsteph | 14:19 | |
| 10 | 2.378 | Sammelklagen Wirecard! Wer ist dabei? | mrymen | Chaecka | 08.04.24 15:23 | |
| 797 | das Portfolio | der Portfolio_Thre. | der Portfolio_Thread | 08.01.24 16:43 | ||
| 22 | 20.193 | Meine Wirecard-Gewinne - Thread! | BorsaMetin | butschi | 19.12.23 12:25 | |
| 2 | 106 | Ex Polizeipräsident | Stronzo1 | Stronzo1 | 15.08.23 09:51 |
