es gibt laut dem Statement von Wyrify schon Verfahren, dh rechtliche Auseinandersetzungen. Siehe:
" awaiting the legal conclusions on the breached contractual relationship, pursued on our behalf by law firms in the US and Sweden." Wyrify scheint sich seiner Sache sehr sicher zu sein, was für STIV schlecht ist.
Was noch viel schwerwiegender ist, ist diese Aussage: "We are aware of Stockholm IT management claiming to be doing a corporate review-process (known as a Due Diligence, DD) on Wyrify, stated as late as last week in live webcasts to investors. This is incorrect. The DD room was closed for access on 23 December 2017, subsequent to that first breach of contract on 18 December. Since then, no DD has been done."
Wyrify sagt da unterm Strich, dass STIV die Aktionäre offen und wissend angelogen hat.
" awaiting the legal conclusions on the breached contractual relationship, pursued on our behalf by law firms in the US and Sweden." Wyrify scheint sich seiner Sache sehr sicher zu sein, was für STIV schlecht ist.
Was noch viel schwerwiegender ist, ist diese Aussage: "We are aware of Stockholm IT management claiming to be doing a corporate review-process (known as a Due Diligence, DD) on Wyrify, stated as late as last week in live webcasts to investors. This is incorrect. The DD room was closed for access on 23 December 2017, subsequent to that first breach of contract on 18 December. Since then, no DD has been done."
Wyrify sagt da unterm Strich, dass STIV die Aktionäre offen und wissend angelogen hat.