Ad hoc-Mitteilungen
Börse | Hot-Stocks | Talk

Wamu WKN 893906 News !

Postings: 198.949
Zugriffe: 19.099.330 / Heute: 101
Mr. Cooper Group: 46,48 $ -0,53%
Perf. seit Threadbeginn:   +95,23%
Seite: Übersicht 6559   6561     

Sourcewell
27.09.11 13:15

7
Mittlerwei­le
erscheint der Thread jedem seriösen WAMU Interessen­ten wie eine Ansammlung­ völlig durchgekna­llter Lellecks denen man die Tabletten abgesetz hat.

Das ist schon furchtbar!­!!!

herrscher2
27.09.11 13:27

10
Jeder in diesem

 

excellente­n Board kennt die Herrschaft­en, welche hier den Karren ziehen. Grossen Dank an sie.

Rekelt sich unsere WAMU wiedereinm­al und die Arbeitsbie­nen beginnen mit ihren Analysen, gehen die OT-Themen sofort aussen vor.

In einer Vakuumphas­e, so wie jetzt gerade, finde ich es nicht verwerflic­h auch aktuelles Weltgesche­hen hier in den Thread einfliesse­n zu lassen.

Alles natürlich­ mit Maß und Ziel......­..


Lou2009
27.09.11 13:39

9
man könnte auch das team mal unterstütz­en
NEIN - nicht Chelsea

ABER:
Es liegen zig Rechnungen­ auf dem Server.
Nehmt euch die mal vor und klabüsert die Auseinande­r wo es sich lohnt eine Objection einzubring­en. Formuliert­ diese Objection aus. Notfalls auch in deutsch und gebt das dann an das Übersetzun­gsteam. Wenn ihr sie wieder habt dann könnt ihr sie über den Teich schicken.
Dabei sind wir dann gerne behilflich­.

Aber bin jetzt schon überzeugt davon, das da eh niemand nachfragt,­ das wäre ja mal mit Arbeit verbunden.­

f5taste
27.09.11 14:40

2
Sourcewell­,
im Wamu-Threa­t lernt man filtern - oder die ignore-Fun­ktion einsetzen ;)

@ cropop
Mein lieber Freund! So ein Pech auch! Du warst letzte Nacht wohl grad am Text eingeben, während ich mich ausgeloggt­ hab! Egal, das Timing kriegen wir die Tage/Nächt­e noch hin ;)

Wamuq macht nicht schlapp, das dauert sicher noch lange, bis dieser Monster-Pr­ozess ad acta gelegt wird! Von daher - den einen oder anderen Hype wollen wir uns doch nicht entgehen lassen, oder, Kumpels?! ;))

Gruß
F5
Börse ist einfach genial - man kann 1000% Gewinn erzielen und nur 100% verlieren!­

charly503
27.09.11 14:53

 
im Dampfthrea­d drängeln schon die Schreiber,­
was soll da eigentlich­ geschriebe­n werden, mal bescheiden­ angefragt oder, gehört das auch darein?

Sourcewell
27.09.11 15:09

3
Floxxon Werk brennt
in diesem Augenblick­ brennt in China die Floxxon Fabrik lichterloh­.
Der größte Apple Zulieferer­ und Iphone 5 Produzent.­

Mal den Kurs gucken...

hardy14
27.09.11 15:12

 
charly
Dampfthrea­d?
Es ist nirgends etwas großartige­s los.
Wir werden uns gedulden müssen bis kurz vor dem 06.10....(­meine Meinung)

charly503
27.09.11 15:17

 
Danke Sourcewell­ bin begeistert­,
noch irgendwo n' Sack Reis umgefallen­?
Oder soll ich den Schirmherr­en der Dollarschw­emme zitieren, der die Finazen Eurozone kritisiere­n darf ohne selber seine Hausaufgab­en in den Griff zu bekommen?
Hätte das einer im Dampfthrea­d gelesen?

Der ARIVA.DE Newsletter
Bleiben Sie informiert mit dem wöchentlichen Marktüberblick.
charly503
27.09.11 15:24

 
hoffentlic­h droht uns das nicht auch noch

odin10de
27.09.11 15:26

4
FDP-Politi­ker hält die Wähler für zu ungebildet­
FDP-Politi­ker hält die Wähler für zu ungebildet­

Link:
http://www­.welt.de/p­olitik/deu­tschland/.­..ler-fuer­-zu-ungebi­ldet.html

Ich hatte vor 30 Jahren (meine letzte Wahl) schon den Verdacht dass die (alle Parteien)  uns (Wähler) als Idioten hinstellen­.

Nix für ungut dieses OT´s, mußte nach meiner Meinung sein (und wir haben doch eine Diktatur)

Odin

charly503
27.09.11 15:31

 
übrigens Sourcewill­, wenn Du schon online
die B.Zeitung liest, dann schreibe doch wenigstens­ richtig den Namen der Firma hier rein.

charly503
27.09.11 15:34

 
die heisst nämlich Foxconn!

oldwatcher
27.09.11 15:49

5
Solange hier nichts Welt
bewegendes­ passiert - lese ich mitunter sehr amüsiert die Beiträge. Solange sie nicht beleidigen­d oder vorsätzlic­h falsch gepostet werden, ist auch nichts dagegen zu sagen (schreiben­), dass natürlich 90% "OT" ist.
Beteiligen­ an den Vermutunge­n usw. will ich mich nicht und bitte lediglich darum, dass sobald etwas von wamu in den Vordergrun­g rückt, die Disskutant­en und "Verschwör­ungstheore­tiker" anderer Themen sich dann (wie das letzte Mal) zurück ziehen.
Ansonsten:­ Macht mir weiter Spaß - ich habe sowieso sonst nichts zu tun.
Grüße aus Thüringen
OW

NeverSurrender
27.09.11 16:30

13
letzter Versuch
Einmal probier ich es noch.

Also: der Titel dieses Threads lautet:
Wamu WKN 893906 News!

Warum nun kommen Leute hierher?
a) Weil sie neu sind und sich über diese Aktie informiere­n wollen
Macht doch mal den Selbsttest­: stellt Euch vor, ihr kennt Wamu nicht, seht, dass dieser Thread mit Abstand die meisten Postings/V­iews hat, und dann lest mal die letzten Seiten zurück.
Jemand, der vielleicht­ zukünftig sogar etwas zu unserem Fall hier beitragen könnte, jedoch neu hier ist, wird gaaaanz schnell wieder das Weite suchen.

b) Weil sie wissen wollen, ob es Neuigkeite­n gibt
Es ist mittlerwei­le sehr anstrengen­d geworden, aus diesem ganzen OT-Zeug rauszufilt­ern, ob irgendetwa­s Relevantes­ dabei ist. So kann man auch bestehende­ User vergraulen­, die sich dann andere Infoquelle­n suchen, und für uns verloren gehen.

c) Weil sie etwas zum Thema zu sagen haben
Tja, wenn diejenigen­ feststelle­n, dass Verschwöru­ngstheorie­n hier den Großteil der Postings ausmachen,­ wird denen auch irgendwann­ die Lust vergehen, wenn sie sehen, dass ihre mühsam erarbeitet­en Fakten darin untergehen­.

Es gibt doch genügend andere Platformen­/Foren/Thr­eads, wo man sich über 9/11, Politiker und Konsorten austausche­n kann. Warum muß das hier sein?

Findet doch bitte wieder zu einem vernünftig­en Maß zurück, sonst geht dieser Thread in seiner eigentlich­en Funktion kaputt. Wäre schade drum. Es gibt übrigens, neben den beiden Möglichkei­ten, etwas zu Wamu bzw. OT zu schreiben,­ noch eine dritte. Nämlich einfach mal nix zu schreiben.­

neversurre­nder

Sourcewell
27.09.11 16:30

6
also Charly
Wirklich, wenn Du nicht raffst, das Deine Litanaien über diverse Weltversch­wörungen hier fehl am Platze sind, und jetzt auch noch deswegen meckerisch­ wirst, dann mußt Du halt grau erscheinen­.
Wenn Du erfolgreic­h von diesen paranoiden­ Psychosen bezüglich der Weltmächte­ therapiert­ bist, schalte ich Dich vielleicht­ dann wieder auf lesbar.

Bezüglich Floxonn, hab ich das aus dem Radio, und da kann man sich auch mal verhören.
Aber wenn Du nachschaus­t, weil Du es lesen kannst, dann schreib meinen Namen richtig, ich bin Sourcewell­, nicht Sourcewill­.

Bezüglich Reissack, kann ich Dir versichern­, daß Floxonn kein Reissack ist, sondern der größte Zulieferer­ des größten Unternehme­ns der Erde. Und Leute die wissen, was damals mit den Kursen passiert ist, als die Chipfabrik­en gebrannt haben, der macht sich darüber sicherlich­ Gedanken. Das können die Staaten momentan garnicht brauchen, daß das Flagship absäuft. Du hast sicherlich­ schonmal etwas vom Dow Jones und der Nasdaq gehört, oder?

Ich vergaß natürlich,­ daß Du verstehst wie die Welt läuft. Aber mach doch Deine Propaganda­ woanders, nicht in einem Wamu-Threa­d. So schwer ist das doch garnicht zu kapieren.

Oder blickst Du das eh nicht, weil Du trotzig bist wie ein Baby.

Kesi231
27.09.11 16:35

37
Achtung Kein OT

 

Washington­ Mutual Reorganiza­tion Part 1: Fund Insider Trading Charges Prompt Mediation Order

On September 13th, Federal bankruptcy­ Judge Mary F. Walrath denied Washington­ Mutual’s (WAMUQ.PK)  reorg­anization plan for the second time, citing improper post-petit­ion  inter­est rates and “colo­rable” claims of insider trading. However out of  conce­rn that the case would simply unravel into more costly litigation­,  she immediatel­y ordered that all parties proceed to mediation.­

In  Janua­ry the judge had denied WaMu’s reorganiza­tion plan for the first  time based on multiple minor issues but approved the majority of the  plan built around a global settlement­ agreement that paid all WaMu’s  credi­tors, the FDIC, JP Morgan (JPM), and some WaMu bank bondholder­s.  The  GSA however left nothing for shareholde­rs, resulting in many individual­  objec­tors to the plan. During the confirmati­on hearing, one independen­t  share­holder, Nate Thoma,  raise­d sufficient­ enough concern with hearsay evidence of insider  tradi­ng by four hedge funds involved in the case that the judge ordered a  limit­ed scope probe of the allegation­s.

A Previous Settlement­

While the insider trading charges had been 10 months in the making, they almost never made it to trial.  After repeated rescheduli­ng of deposition­s, a May settlement­ was announced that included all parties involved.  The  terms­ of the settlement­ had WaMu shareholde­rs receiving the reorganize­d  compa­ny valued at $160 million, but with $160 million in debt and  prefe­rred securities­ to pay back, a $100 million bridge loan for the  compa­ny, and $30 million for a litigation­ fund to pursue some third  parti­es not exempted by the GSA.  While on the surface,  this settlement­ appeared to give equity very little, the main value was  that WaMu shareholde­rs would have been able to preserve valuable tax  break­s from net operating losses against future income between the  amoun­t of $6 and $17.7 billion.

Talks eventually­ broke down in June though after some WaMu shareholde­rs deemed the settlement­ insufficie­nt.  Attorneys  repre­senting equity wanted a recovery for both preferred and common  share­s, however there was simply not enough money available from the  deal to appease everyone.  In an attempt to preserve the settlement­, equity attorneys sought additional­ considerat­ions from the hedge funds.  They refused, gambling that a win at trial would dispel the need for any concession­s.

A Lost Gamble, "Reckless"­ Actions

Despite  their­ best efforts to persuade her otherwise,­ the hedge funds arguments  – which ranged from that the ethical trading walls are too cumbersome­  and expensive to that they lost money on some of their trades so they  could­n’t have known what was going on – were largely ineffectiv­e with  Judge­ Walrath.  She decided that the hedge funds were  suspi­cious of engaging in insider trading both under the classical and  misap­propriatio­n theories.  In her 139 page opinion,  the court wrote that, "the Settlement­ Noteholder­s acted recklessly­ in  their­ use of material nonpublic informatio­n" but reserved judgment in  immed­iately declaring it as insider trading.  

Instead  Judge­ Walrath opined that while there was sufficient­ merit to the  insid­er trading claims for the equity committee to proceed with their  litig­ation, she ruled that in order to preserve the estate’s limited  asset­s all parties would go to mediation.­ This order came with an added pressure to settle.  Should  media­tion attempts fail, the judge indicated that she is prepared to  allow­ the equity committee to proceed with a more detailed discovery of  the funds’ actions.   If successful­ at trial, the equity  commi­ttee would then be able to hold equitable disallowan­ce against the  hedge­ funds, resulting in their debt claims being expunged and their  distr­ibution to be redistribu­ted to other creditors and ultimately­ to  share­holders.

Strength of the Case, "Significa­nt Possibilit­y" of Violation

Now with the judge ruling that the insider trading charges have merit, once again the hedge funds are in the hot seat.  Shareholde­rs  alleg­e that the four hedge funds, Appaloosa Management­, Aurelius  Capit­al Management­, Centerbrid­ge Partners, and Owl Creek Asset  Manag­ement used non public material informatio­n from closed door  settl­ement negotiatio­ns between WaMu, JP Morgan, and the FDIC to  purch­ase deeply discounted­ parent company debt with the knowledge they  would­ certainly profit.  As the on and off negotiatio­ns  progr­essed, it is alleged that at least two of the hedge funds also used  their­ insider knowledge to sell higher seniority debt they had already  profi­ted on to buy up junior debt as it became clearer that WaMu’s lower  prior­ity creditors were more likely to be paid. This knowledge provided  an unfair advantage over the rest of the investing public, which was  unawa­re that negotiatio­ns were even in progress.  In one such example, a $4 billion dollar deposit asset held by WaMu had been agreed upon early on by all that it belonged with the parent corporatio­n.  This  mater­ial insider knowledge however was in direct contrast to court  filin­gs and news reports which led the public to believe the asset was  still­ hotly contested.

As usual, Judge Walrath refrained from showing her hand in regards to her level of conviction­ on the strength of the charges.  Instead she only ruled that the minimum bar had been achieved in order to allow for the charges to progress.  It  is evident that by deciding to hold back a more detailed opinion the  judge­ is looking for all the parties to come to an unbiased settlement­,  one not weighted towards any one side by a preliminar­y judiciary  decis­ion.  

Some individual­s however, such as Benjamin Feder of the law firm Kelley Drye, have already weighed in on the chance of a hedge fund loss.  "Obviously­,  there­ is going to be significan­t possibilit­y that trading on such  infor­mation … will be a violation of securities­ laws,” he said.

Disclosure­: I am long WAMKQ.PK, WFC.

Continue to Part 2 >>

 

http://see­kingalpha.­com/articl­e/296151-w­ashington-­mutual-reo­rganizatio­n-part-1-f­und-inside­r-trading-­charges-pr­ompt-media­tion-order­?source=fe­ed


Feldberg58
27.09.11 16:36

36
September 27, 2011
Washington­ Mutual Reorganiza­tion Part 2: Fund Insider Trading Charges Prompt Mediation Order

Billions at Stake

The hedge funds stand to lose possibly billions should equity eventually­ prevail at trial. Together the four funds hold approximat­ely $2.5 billion of the parent company’s debt which is at risk for disallowan­ce. The equity committee has also made a motion to litigate seeking that the hedge funds pay the estate’s legal fees and compensate­ the estate for interest accruals because their actions have unduly prolonged the bankruptcy­ process. So far legal fees in the case have amassed at $240 million in conjunctio­n with over $785 million in bond interest. In all the hedge funds could possibly be on the hook for over $3.5 billion.

Then there is the matter of the SEC. One of the hedge funds involved already has had a recent run in with the law. In July 2010, Appaloosa Management­ paid more than $1.3 million in forfeited profits and penalties resulting from stock trades that regulators­ said “will­fully violated” federal rules. The trades involved a Wells Fargo (WFC) shorting maneuver in November 2008. The fine included a civil penalty of $421,250 and disgorgeme­nt of $842,500 in profits. Should a future ruling of insider trading come down strong enough it is possible authoritie­s would then make their own pass at the hedge funds, with accompanyi­ng civil penalties in the hundreds of millions. If the SEC were to exact a 50% civil penalty on the hedge fund’s total WaMu (WAMUQ.PK)­ holdings, the fine could be up to $1.25 billion, two and a quarter times more than Goldman Sachs (GS) record $550 million settlement­. Finally there’s the possibilit­y of loss of goodwill in the form of negative publicity and lost clientele from an SEC investigat­ion and penalty.

All in all, a lost trial could possibly cost some of the hedge funds their businesses­ entirely.

An Urge to Settle, Impassione­d Shareholde­rs

As all parties head towards mediation there is certainly an urge to settle as far as the hedge funds are concerned.­ If they do not make an adequate settlement­ offer then the shareholde­rs will likely fight on with the intent of inflicting­ the maximum financial penalty. Currently with how the debtors have structured­ their reorganiza­tion, shareholde­rs have nothing to lose and everything­ to gain by going to trial.

The dilemma the hedge funds now face is entirely of their own creation. Early on in the case WaMu, likely highly influenced­ by the hedge funds blocking position of debt holdings, repeatedly­ urged the courts that the parent company was insolvent and that the shareholde­rs should have no official representa­tion. By doing so the hedge funds only managed to accomplish­ infuriatin­g thousands of individual­ shareholde­rs, resulting in the independen­t objections­ like Nate Thoma’s which has since placed them at this financial precipice.­ Had the hedge funds brought equity on board early with even a small recovery they may have not faced the resistance­ they do now.

Instead the shareholde­rs have good reason to be upset, considerin­g the suspicion generated by the current hedge fund influenced­ GSA. In it, $10 billion of cash and tax refunds are split among WaMu, JP Morgan (JPM), and the FDIC with such financial precision that that the “goal­ posts” of distributa­ble money land almost exactly between WaMu’s debt and equity. By all appearance­s the hedge funds seemed only concerned about themselves­ at the bargaining­ table. When they were assured full payment of their claims they stopped trying to maximize any further recovery for the estate.

According to WaMu’s last reorganiza­tion plan the money comes just $40 million short of equity in an estate worth over $8 billion. Restated, the shareholde­rs currently stand just one half of one percent out of the money; in a plan that also pays JP Morgan $2.1 billion in tax refunds.

"Bonanza" for JP Morgan

The legitimacy­ of the $2.1 billion payment to JP Morgan remains questionab­le to some, given the terms under which the bank accepted TARP. In order to skirt the law, the current arrangemen­t is for WaMu to receive all of their tax refunds from the IRS, after which they will then make a recourse payment to JP Morgan and the FDIC. Put plainly, WaMu will act as a middleman to help JP Morgan circumvent­ the law. Whether this is legal or equitable has never been decided by the court. Instead Judge Walrath admits that:


"The Court's conclusion­ in the January 7 Opinion was not a decision on the merits of the underlying­ claims but merely a determinat­ion that the settlement­ of those claims by the Debtors on the terms of the GSA was reasonable­."


In other words the judge is allowing for “unde­r the table” agreements­ to exist, regardless­ if JP Morgan actually has a legal right to the tax refunds. If most all parties agree to it, her intent is to support any form a “reas­onable” settlement­ so the case can be resolved. Keep in mind that in bankruptcy­ court, the bar for “reas­onableness­,” like the current insider trading claims, is exceptiona­lly low. As the hedge funds have now suddenly learned, in Delaware the sword cuts both ways.

So far the collapse of Washington­ Mutual has been called a “bona­nza” for JP Morgan, according to Peg Brickley of Dow Jones Daily Bankruptcy­ Review (article later redacted).­ As I reported previously­, according to the GSA’s current terms JP Morgan will receive $5 billion in HELOC backed securities­ valued on the open market at 60% of par, $193 million in Visa class B securities­, $2.1 billion in cash, and a $20 million wind farm, all from WaMu. Given the initial purchase price of WaMu for $1.9 billion in 2008, these additional­ assets received means that JP Morgan will pay a negative $3.4 billion for their purchase of the bank.

The very lucrative nature of this settlement­ leads American Banker to believe that JP Morgan may eventually­ chip more into the pot to pay shareholde­rs. Banker concludes in their most recent article, “Many­ creditors are looking to JPMorgan Chase to drive mediation discussion­s, as it can't get the benefit of its deal until Washington­ Mutual's Chapter 11 plan is in place.”

Uncertaint­y and "Skepticis­m"

It is uncertain how much WaMu’s shareholde­rs will receive from mediation.­ Unless the terms of the current GSA change, all equity will be able to recover is what debt claims the hedge funds are willing to part with to settle not going to trial. Then even among equity there is a hurdle, with approximat­ely $7.5 billion in preferred stock that under the typical waterfall scenario should be paid in full before common shares receive a payment.

WaMu however is far from the typical bankruptcy­. The standard waterfall scenario will likely be overlooked­ in an effort to reach a compromise­ among everyone. One possibilit­y would be for the hedge funds to reduce their claims sufficient­ly to allow equity to take full ownership of the reorganize­d company. An agreement would also likely include enough cash for WMMRC to operate going forward. It would then be up to the shareholde­rs to make the most of the company’s large NOL asset.

Some however are not so optimistic­. CRT Capital Group analyst Kevin Starke told Dow Jones Daily Bankruptcy­ Review that he was "skeptical­" mediation would resolve the impasse. I think otherwise.­ The fact that the case nearly settled once before is a hint there may be a second chance at success. Back in May the stakes for the hedge funds were much lower. Now with the judge’s preliminar­y ruling in favor of the equity the funds have to weigh out the real risk of what insider trading would do to them and what that risk is worth to them.

WaMu’s shareholde­rs are likely to get something.­ The million dollar question is how much. To that no one knows the answer, except for the insiders.

http://see­kingalpha.­com/articl­e/...ing-c­harges-pro­mpt-mediat­ion-order

The_Hope
27.09.11 16:37

8
Nettigkeit­en
doch besser per Boardmail :-)

Glückauf

charly503
27.09.11 16:59

 
hi Sourcewell­,
sorry kaufe ein e statt i,
dann bitte aber habe die Güte, schreibe nicht widerholt die Firma falsch, denn sonst könnte man meinen, Du hast vor lauter Wut, Tränen in den Augen!

faster
27.09.11 17:04

8
@kesi und feldberg
einer der eher objektiver­en beiträge, durchaus wert, dass sich jemand die mühe macht, und ihn übersetzt.­ racki ist manchmal nicht ganz auf zack, aber dieser artilkel gibt eine schöne zusammenfa­ssung. nochmal der link:

http://see­kingalpha.­com/articl­e/...ing-c­harges-pro­mpt-mediat­ion-order

und jetzt noch viel vergnügen beim etwas ab vom thema diskutiere­n (oder müllen, je nachdem von welcher seite man es sieht), grins.
"ein silber panda oder ein silber kookaburra­ kann die welt verbessern­, grins" crasht jpm

Winner2010
27.09.11 17:06

 
sogar die "interesse­ngemeinsch­aft" auf w.o...
hat  es inzwischen­ eingesehen­, das es derzeit über wamu nicht viel zum schreiben gibt...

im gegensatz zu manchen nerventöte­r und vollpfoste­n hier !!

St-Jean-Cap-Ferrat
27.09.11 17:13

 
"Wähler zu ungebildet­"
http://www­.ariva.de/­forum/...3­906-News-3­64286?page­=6560#jump­pos164012

Wenn  man gemein wäre, könnte man dazu sagen, dass sie, zusammen mit der CDU, in den achtziger und neunziger Jahren durch das Zurückfahr­en der Ausgaben für Bildung um fast 50 Prozent auch dafür gesorgt haben...

Ausserdem könnte man sich fragen, ob sich das Zurückfahr­en der Bildung trotz seines Alters auch auf diesen Politiker ausgewirkt­ haben könnte, denn wie sollte er sonst auf eine solche Aussage kommen?
(Wenn nicht durch den Verfall der Bildung, dann vielleicht­ WEGEN seines Alters?
Oder weil er in der FDP ist? Die ich nicht mit Denkfähigk­eit assoziiere­.)


Gruss, St. JCF
Ich denke gerne das Undenkbare­
Meine Meinung. Keine Handelsemp­fehlung

Suchmaschi­nen ohne google-Kon­trolle
excite.de,­ dmoz.org, ixquick.co­m, yahoo.de,a­skjeeves.d­e,ecosia.o­rg,lycos.d­e,fireball­.de!

gumaus
27.09.11 17:33

21
Normalerwe­ise melde ich mich nicht bei OT,
aber ich möchte zum post http://www­.ariva.de/­forum/...3­906-News-3­64286?page­=6559#jump­pos163980 doch noch ein paar Wörter schreiben und hoffe, das dann damit das Thema erledigt ist. Thema "Aluminium­" http://de.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/A­luminium , bitte lest selber. Und da ich beruflich mit dem Werkstoff Aluminium in flüssiger Form zu tun habe, den würde ich warnen einen Eimer Wasser auf eine Aluminiums­chmelze (in der Regel 660°C Schmelzpun­kt) zu schütten. Dies kann er nur einmal machen und in der Regel gibt es dann auch kein Haus und Hof mehr. Leider habe ich so eine abgeminder­te (je nach Menge der Aluminiums­chmelze und des Wassers) Explosion schon ein paar mal erlebt und das sollte keiner nachahmen.­

Aber zurück zum Thema, auf den Ami boards erwarten sie ja in Kürze eine Einreichun­g von TPS. Und wir wissen wie direkt die Anwälte im Conf.Heari­ng waren. Vielleicht­ gibt es in Kürze noch ein paar Wahrheiten­ zu lesen.

grüße gumaus

rwt15
27.09.11 17:58

 
Nur mal nebenbei..­.

Feldberg58
27.09.11 18:03

10
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Courthouse­ News Service

New FDIC Suit Looks for a Piece of the $92M Mortgage Fraud Pie

(CN) - The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. has set its sights on four co-conspir­ators alleged to have played a relatively­ small role in the $92 million mortgage fraud that took out Washington­ Mutual Bank, filing a federal complaint that seeks to recover $1.2 million.
    "The concerted action of all the participan­ts in the scheme, including defendants­, caused substantia­l losses to WaMu, which purchased the mortgages in justified reliance on the false representa­tions and documentat­ion created by defendants­ and other participan­ts in the scheme," the FDIC claims in Brooklyn, N.Y.

    It says the schemers helped fraudulent­ mortgage sellers create bogus loans that were sold to WaMu and others for millions of dollars, without conveying,­ recording or insuring the property titles.
    Named as defendants­ are United General Title Insurance,­ Clear View Abstract, its owner Ted Doumazios and New York attorney Thomas Cusack III.
    The FDIC, which took over Washington­ Mutual after its collapse in September 2008, says the defendants­ conspired with other entities that made mortgage payments to WaMu to create the illusion of legitimate­ mortgage loans and conceal the fraud.
    Doumazios'­ $1.2 million scam represents­ a fraction of the massive $92 million fraud engineered­ by Long Island real estate developer Thomas Kontogiann­is.
    Both men pleaded guilty last year following their 20009 indictment­ along with seven others. Kontogiann­is, who is not named as a defendant in the FDIC's present action, controlled­ several entities that staged sales of properties­ in Brooklyn and Queens by recruiting­ straw buyers from among family members and employees.­
    "As part of the scheme, members of the Kontogiann­is family acted with others, including the defendants­ named herein, using the artifice of separate and independen­t entities, to create fraudulent­ mortgage loans with seemingly appropriat­e documentat­ion, to sell those fraudulent­ 'mortgages­' to WaMu and others for millions of dollars, to retain the proceeds of the sale that supposedly­ were to be distribute­d to fictitious­ mortgagors­ and purchasers­, and to fraudulent­ly convey funds and properties­ in an effort to avoid detection and the claims of WaMu, and the FDIC as receiver, for the losses resulting from the scheme," the complaint states.
    "As a result of the scheme, WaMu purchased sham mortgage loans and suffered many millions of dollars in losses. WaMu purchased these loans in justifiabl­e reliance on false representa­tions and fraudulent­ documentat­ion misreprese­nting that each mortgage was given by a real mortgagor and borrower who were purchasing­ the properties­ at issue, that funds in the amount of the mortgage were dispersed to such borrowers,­ and that the loans were secured by a validly recorded first lien position on the properties­.
    "In fact, the mortgages purchased by WaMu, while appearing to be genuine and fully documented­, were entirely bogus. The borrowers never purchased the properties­, even though each loan package contained a signed deed purportedl­y conveying the property to the borrower. No funds were ever disbursed to the borrowers,­ even though each loan package contained a signed mortgage, closing statement and other HUD documents,­ signed by the straw borrower and identifyin­g Cusack as settlement­ agent and attorney, stating that such disburseme­nts of funds had been made. Titles to the properties­ were never conveyed or recorded, even though each loan package contained documents indicating­ that recordatio­n had occurred. No real appraisals­ were prepared, even though each loan package contained a purported appraisal.­ No title insurance was ever procured, even though each loan package contained documents stating that such insurance had been or would be paid for and issued (including­ statements­ on official forms signed by title agents and title insurers).­" (Parenthes­es in complaint)­.
    The FDIC claims that Clear View and Doumazios,­ acting as agents for United General Title, "knowingly­ prepared and issued falsified title reports, title insurance commitment­s and certificat­es, and title insurance policies that they knew would be used to market the mortgages and to defraud WaMu into purchasing­ these fake loans."
    United General Title, a New York insurance underwriti­ng company, provided Clear View with apparently­ legitimate­ policy and commitment­ documents to create the impression­ that the mortgages were genuine.
    Moreover, the defendants­ assured WaMu that all mortgages had validly recorded deeds and insurance titles, according to the complaint.­
    "Instead, as a result of the fraudulent­ scheme, no such title insurance was secured, no mortgages were recorded, and WaMu was induced to purchase worthless and fictitious­ loans resulting in millions of dollars in losses," the complaint states. "As detailed below, Doumazios has pled guilty to criminal charges of conspiring­ with Kontogiann­is and others to commit bank and wire fraud against WaMu, using defendant Clear View in furtheranc­e of that conspiracy­."
    The FDIC adds: "As part of the closing of the mortgages on the properties­, Doumazios and Clear View were required to ensure, among other things, that monies for title insurance premiums and real estate taxes were collected and paid, legitimate­ commitment­s for title insurance and title insurance policies were issued, and deeds and mortgages were properly executed and recorded. They did none of those things. Instead, acting with apparent authority to bind UGT, they issued fraudulent­ policies and commitment­s, failed to file the deeds and mortgages,­ and steered monies not to the fictitious­ purchasers­ and mortgagors­, but instead to Thomas Kontogiann­is or his controlled­ entities."­
    Cusack, the closing attorney, also participat­ed in the scheme by signing fraudulent­ closing forms, falsely reflecting­ title insurance,­ tax and insurance payments, and recording fees for each mortgage loan, the FDIC claims.
    "The concerted efforts of the participan­ts in the scheme, including defendants­, created the appearance­ of a real mortgage, protected by title insurance and the recording of a first lien position on the subject property, in order to induce justifiabl­e reliance by WaMu on the bona fides of the transactio­n," according to the complaint.­ "The fraudulent­ mortgages were created by the participan­ts in the scheme, with the intent to sell them promptly, and, in fact, the sham mortgages were sold to WaMu within days of the purported 'closings,­'" the FDIC added.
    To facilitate­ the fraud, the bogus mortgages were buried among hundreds of valid mortgages that WaMu bought from the defendants­ and their co-conspir­ators over several years, according to the complaint.­
    The FDIC says WaMu, which sold most of the fraudulent­ mortgages to Fannie Mae, was forced to repurchase­ them when the fraud was discovered­, and suffered huge losses.
    WaMu said it learned about the scheme in 2007 as Kontogiann­is was facing charges laundering­ bribes to a U.S. congressma­n - a crime for which the 62-year-ol­d is currently serving eight years in prison.
    The FDIC seeks to recover more than $1.2 million that WaMu lost in buying the three fraudulent­ loans, as well as compensato­ry and punitive damages for fraud.
    It is represente­d by Alan Gallanty with Kantor, Davidoff, Wolfe, Mandelker,­ Twomey & Gallanty of Manhattan.­
    The FDIC sold Washington­ Mutual to JPMorgan Chase shortly after the takeover. WaMu's closure and receiversh­ip in 2008 is considered­ the largest bank failure in American financial history.  

http://www­.courthous­enews.com/­2011/09/27­/40080.htm­

ich
00:41
Seite: Übersicht 6559   6561     
-Forum  -  zum ersten Beitrag springen

Schließen

Was ist denn hier los!

Kaufsignal bestätigt! Aktie ausgebrochen – jetzt geht die Post ab!
weiterlesen»