haben sich hier alle wieder so lieb !
Top-News
Neuester,
zuletzt geles. Beitrag
Antworten | Börsenforum Übersicht
Zurück
Weiter
... 1477 1478 1480 1481 ...
Antworten | Börsenforum Übersicht
Zurück
Weiter ... 1477 1478 1480 1481 ...
COOP News (ehemals: Wamu /WMIH)
Beiträge: 86.762
Zugriffe: 22.296.461 / Heute: 5.018
Zugriffe: 22.296.461 / Heute: 5.018
|
Werbung
Entdecke die beliebtesten ETFs von Xtrackers
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1D
Perf. 12M: +155,87%
Xtrackers MSCI Pakistan Swap UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +64,68%
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +52,81%
Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D
Perf. 12M: +48,05%
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +45,34%
habe mich am 25.1.13 hier angemeldet...
Und mich heute gedanklich von diesem Forum verabschiedet...
In diesem Forum zählen nicht mehr Info´s zu WMIH ...
Auch Spekulationen zu unserer Perle gehen unter !
In diesem Forum geht es nur noch ...
Um Selbstdarstellung...
Um Beleidigungen aller Art !
Sorry, das ist nicht mein Ding !
VG
Gelöschter Beitrag.
Einblenden
»
#36953 
ist nur teilbedingt echt.
Faster hat sehr viel zu Wmih geschrieben, find es echt genial , Lander auch.
Faster hat sehr viel zu Wmih geschrieben, find es echt genial , Lander auch.
...in allen Threads wieder finden. Je mehr User, desto mehr Polarität! Eine heile Welt gibt es in den Foren nicht. Sich zu verabschieden bedeutet nur aufzugeben. Das wird Dich nicht weiterbringen und wäre schade...
Versehe die User, von denen Du nichts lesen magst, lieber mit einem grauen Balken und lass Dich von den negativen Beiträgen nicht runter ziehen!
Versehe die User, von denen Du nichts lesen magst, lieber mit einem grauen Balken und lass Dich von den negativen Beiträgen nicht runter ziehen!
Gelöschter Beitrag.
Einblenden
»
#36956
Kirri---> mach dir nix draus bei Facebook sind wir besser aufgehoben !!!
Dieses Forum ist Müll !!!
Flasche leer
Regards
Trappa
Dieses Forum ist Müll !!!
Flasche leer
Regards
Trappa
WaMu Can't Recover Taxes On Thrift Buys In $15M Suit
Law360, Los Angeles (February 10, 2014, 8:27 PM ET) -- A Washington federal judge dismissed claims in Washington Mutual Inc.'s $15 million suit seeking to recover excess taxes it paid after buying up faltering savings and loan associations, ruling Monday that the bank hadn't established a cost basis for the alleged overpayments.
Granting judgment in favor of the federal government, U.S. District Judge Barbara J. Rothstein said WaMu failed to establish its entitlement to a tax refund because it hadn't proven what cost basis a predecessor had to rights over maintaining branches in other states and.
www.law360.com/banking/articles/508821/...ift-buys-in-15m-suit
Law360, Los Angeles (February 10, 2014, 8:27 PM ET) -- A Washington federal judge dismissed claims in Washington Mutual Inc.'s $15 million suit seeking to recover excess taxes it paid after buying up faltering savings and loan associations, ruling Monday that the bank hadn't established a cost basis for the alleged overpayments.
Granting judgment in favor of the federal government, U.S. District Judge Barbara J. Rothstein said WaMu failed to establish its entitlement to a tax refund because it hadn't proven what cost basis a predecessor had to rights over maintaining branches in other states and.
www.law360.com/banking/articles/508821/...ift-buys-in-15m-suit
otcshortreport.com/index.php?index=WMIH&action=view
Ich denke ja.
Ich denke ja.
Wer viel Geld hat, ist reich. Wer keine Krankheit hat, ist glücklich!
Law360, Los Angeles (February 10, 2014, 8:27 PM ET) -- A Washington federal judge dismissed claims in Washington Mutual Inc.'s $15 million suit seeking to recover excess taxes it paid after buying up faltering savings and loan associations, ruling Monday that the bank hadn't established a cost basis for the alleged overpayments.
Granting judgment in favor of the federal government, U.S. District Judge Barbara J. Rothstein said WaMu failed to establish its entitlement to a tax refund because it hadn't proven what cost basis a predecessor had to rights over maintaining branches in other states and using the purchase method of accounting for regulatory capital reserve purposes.
The Ninth Circuit in March 2011 remanded the matter to the lower court to determine the cost basis, after reversing the district court's ruling that WaMu couldn't deduct from its taxes the liabilities that Home Savings of America FSB had taken on by buying three failing savings and loan associations.
But Judge Rothstein said Monday that while the Ninth Circuit accepted WaMu's argument that a taxpayer in Home Savings’ position had a cost basis in the branching and so-called RAP rights, the plaintiff didn't properly identify the cost basis.
"Given that the plaintiff failed to establish the fair market value for the Missouri branching right, the court is unable to ascertain the cost basis for either the branching rights or the RAP right or, for that matter, to the incentive package," the judge wrote.
WaMu acquired three savings and loan associations, also called thrifts, by buying Home Savings, which had originally bought the thrifts during the savings and loan crisis of the early 1980s, according to court papers.
The crisis stemmed from the thrifts' inability to pay high interest rates to depositors with revenue from lower-interest loans they had extended earlier that left many thrifts near insolvency, including the three at issue in the case.
Like many banks, Home Savings agreed to take on the thrifts, and their hefty liabilities, in response to U.S. government incentives that allowed it to change how it valued the banks' assets to make it easier to meet federal capital requirements, the Ninth Circuit said.
The government created the incentives to avoid having to cover the banks through its Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp. insurance program, according to the Ninth Circuit.
The banks were allowed to use the “purchase method” of accounting for capital reserve purposes, gaining so-called RAP rights. WaMu argued that the RAP rights had tax implications, and said it was owed at least $15.5 million because certain deductions had been disallowed.
The IRS denied the claim, saying those RAP rights, if recognized, would make the mergers inconsistent with their classification under tax law.
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the banks negotiated favorable tax treatment as part of their merger, and the government had a “pretty clear picture” all along that the bank was doing it a favor by taking on the liabilities from the three failing companies.
WaMu argued that its costs in acquiring the thrifts could be calculated simply by comparing their assets to their liabilities, but the Ninth Circuit countered that the calculation was more complicated than that and sent the case to the district court for further proceedings.
Judge Rothstein said Monday that while the appeals court held that the branching and RAP rights had a cost basis that could qualify Home Savings for a tax refund, the plaintiff relied on erroneous projections and unrealistic assumptions in attempting to establish the fair market value for all the rights. Thus, WaMu couldn't pursue tax refund claims for the 1990, 1991 and 1993 tax years, she said.
Moreover, WaMu also wasn't entitled to a refund for abandonment loss for the 1993 tax year because it hadn't persuaded the court that Home Savings permanently abandoned its right to operate branches in Missouri, according to the judge.
Attorneys for both parties didn't immediately respond to requests for comment late Monday.
WaMu is represented by Thomas D. Johnston and Richard J. Gagnon Jr. of Shearman & Sterling LLP; David J. Burman and Jeffrey M. Hanson of Perkins Coie LLP; and Maria O. Jones and Steven R. Dixon of Miller & Chevalier Chartered.
The case is Washington Mutual Inc. v. U.S., case number 2:06-cv-01550, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.
--Additional reporting by Richard Vanderford. Editing by Edrienne Su.
Granting judgment in favor of the federal government, U.S. District Judge Barbara J. Rothstein said WaMu failed to establish its entitlement to a tax refund because it hadn't proven what cost basis a predecessor had to rights over maintaining branches in other states and using the purchase method of accounting for regulatory capital reserve purposes.
The Ninth Circuit in March 2011 remanded the matter to the lower court to determine the cost basis, after reversing the district court's ruling that WaMu couldn't deduct from its taxes the liabilities that Home Savings of America FSB had taken on by buying three failing savings and loan associations.
But Judge Rothstein said Monday that while the Ninth Circuit accepted WaMu's argument that a taxpayer in Home Savings’ position had a cost basis in the branching and so-called RAP rights, the plaintiff didn't properly identify the cost basis.
"Given that the plaintiff failed to establish the fair market value for the Missouri branching right, the court is unable to ascertain the cost basis for either the branching rights or the RAP right or, for that matter, to the incentive package," the judge wrote.
WaMu acquired three savings and loan associations, also called thrifts, by buying Home Savings, which had originally bought the thrifts during the savings and loan crisis of the early 1980s, according to court papers.
The crisis stemmed from the thrifts' inability to pay high interest rates to depositors with revenue from lower-interest loans they had extended earlier that left many thrifts near insolvency, including the three at issue in the case.
Like many banks, Home Savings agreed to take on the thrifts, and their hefty liabilities, in response to U.S. government incentives that allowed it to change how it valued the banks' assets to make it easier to meet federal capital requirements, the Ninth Circuit said.
The government created the incentives to avoid having to cover the banks through its Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp. insurance program, according to the Ninth Circuit.
The banks were allowed to use the “purchase method” of accounting for capital reserve purposes, gaining so-called RAP rights. WaMu argued that the RAP rights had tax implications, and said it was owed at least $15.5 million because certain deductions had been disallowed.
The IRS denied the claim, saying those RAP rights, if recognized, would make the mergers inconsistent with their classification under tax law.
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the banks negotiated favorable tax treatment as part of their merger, and the government had a “pretty clear picture” all along that the bank was doing it a favor by taking on the liabilities from the three failing companies.
WaMu argued that its costs in acquiring the thrifts could be calculated simply by comparing their assets to their liabilities, but the Ninth Circuit countered that the calculation was more complicated than that and sent the case to the district court for further proceedings.
Judge Rothstein said Monday that while the appeals court held that the branching and RAP rights had a cost basis that could qualify Home Savings for a tax refund, the plaintiff relied on erroneous projections and unrealistic assumptions in attempting to establish the fair market value for all the rights. Thus, WaMu couldn't pursue tax refund claims for the 1990, 1991 and 1993 tax years, she said.
Moreover, WaMu also wasn't entitled to a refund for abandonment loss for the 1993 tax year because it hadn't persuaded the court that Home Savings permanently abandoned its right to operate branches in Missouri, according to the judge.
Attorneys for both parties didn't immediately respond to requests for comment late Monday.
WaMu is represented by Thomas D. Johnston and Richard J. Gagnon Jr. of Shearman & Sterling LLP; David J. Burman and Jeffrey M. Hanson of Perkins Coie LLP; and Maria O. Jones and Steven R. Dixon of Miller & Chevalier Chartered.
The case is Washington Mutual Inc. v. U.S., case number 2:06-cv-01550, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.
--Additional reporting by Richard Vanderford. Editing by Edrienne Su.
Fünf mal hat der extrachilli gestern noch nachgetreten, Von 00:10 bis 01:19 konnte er sich nicht beherrschen, dass ist schon ein negativ Rekord.
In seinen Postings warf er mir alles vor, für was er sich selbst nicht zu schade ist. Typen gibt es, da schüttelt es einen. Es wäre wohl besser gewesen, er wäre schlafen gegangen.
Im Posting # 36949 darf ich dann lesen ….Zitat: schon mitbekommen, dass Dich kaum einer leiden kann? An was mag das wohl liegen? Zita Ende…..
Ich werde dir mal was sagen/Schreiben, extrachilli.
Die Ausgeschlossenheit ist für mich eine Form von Freiheit, für die ich dankbar bin.
Du bist in der Not, Postings zum Wohlwollen anderer zu schreiben, ich brauch diesen Luxus nicht.
Meine Freude über den Kurssprung ist viel zu groß, um auf weiteres einzugehen. Den User Kirroyal kann ich durchaus verstehen.
In seinen Postings warf er mir alles vor, für was er sich selbst nicht zu schade ist. Typen gibt es, da schüttelt es einen. Es wäre wohl besser gewesen, er wäre schlafen gegangen.
Im Posting # 36949 darf ich dann lesen ….Zitat: schon mitbekommen, dass Dich kaum einer leiden kann? An was mag das wohl liegen? Zita Ende…..
Ich werde dir mal was sagen/Schreiben, extrachilli.
Die Ausgeschlossenheit ist für mich eine Form von Freiheit, für die ich dankbar bin.
Du bist in der Not, Postings zum Wohlwollen anderer zu schreiben, ich brauch diesen Luxus nicht.
Meine Freude über den Kurssprung ist viel zu groß, um auf weiteres einzugehen. Den User Kirroyal kann ich durchaus verstehen.
Wo Angst herrscht verkriecht sich die Vernunft.
...gemacht. Allerdings, wie kommst Du darauf, dass meine Beiträge zum Wohlwollen anderer User wären? Ich glaube nicht, dass sie unbedingt scharf darauf sind, solche Beiträge von mir zu lesen, aber ich kläre gerne auf! Und bei Usern wie Dir ist das auch notwendig!
na, so chillig bist wohl doch nicht unterwegs.
du pöbelst hier ganz schön rum
verpiss dich einfach, weil deinen Kindergartenrotz eh nimmand lesen will
du pöbelst hier ganz schön rum
verpiss dich einfach, weil deinen Kindergartenrotz eh nimmand lesen will
den Rotz von der unreifen Frucht brauche ich aber auch nicht
Nee, muss nicht
Moin Leute!
erstmal Tass Kaff & Glückauf
Moin Leute!
erstmal Tass Kaff & Glückauf
wichtig wäre schonmal wenn ananas den beitrag von yoda heute mal NICHT löschen lässt, und bitte nicht wieder mit urheberrechtsverletzung droht, nur weil mehr als 3 Sätze kopiert wurden. also bitte stehen lassen, da nicht jeder hier zugang zu den vollen law360 Beiträgen hat. ansonsten danke an chilli für seinen einsatz hier, ich habe verstanden was er meint.
vielen dank an kroetendetektor, wieder mal ein guter job!
so, viel spass heute.
vielen dank an kroetendetektor, wieder mal ein guter job!
so, viel spass heute.
5 Jahre nur Verarsche, mit Glück einem Totalverlust entgangen, insgesamt doch nur ein auf der Stelle treten, permanentes Erwarten des nächsten Tiefschlages.....
....da kann die Stimmung nur "menschlich" sein.
Ich habe gestern ein kräftiges Lebenszeichen gesehen und freue mich auf die nächsten Tage. ;-)
dumm rumrotzt,
aggressiv meist nur andere angeht,
nichts zum Thema schreibt,
der fliegt !
aggressiv meist nur andere angeht,
nichts zum Thema schreibt,
der fliegt !
ist hier meine Lieblingsfarbe geworden. Obwohl...ich gebe ihr einen schöneren Namen: SPACKENGRAU...
So jetzt wieder zu WMI...
Schöner Handel gestern. Gegen 5-6% täglich habe ich nichts einzuwenden. Auf zum nächsten Step....
So jetzt wieder zu WMI...
Schöner Handel gestern. Gegen 5-6% täglich habe ich nichts einzuwenden. Auf zum nächsten Step....
Ich muss schon sagen, ich habe ja mit vielem gerechnet, aber nicht damit, dass wir nach beinahe acht Jahren (!) Klagezeit in der Geschichte WMI vs. United States am Ende leer ausgehen. Muss mir das Urteil heute Abend erst einmal anschauen. Für diejenigen, die wissen wollen, worum es eigentlich geht, hier noch einmal ein paar Links zu älteren Beiträgen von mir:
http://www.ariva.de/forum/...3906-News-364286?page=7774#jumppos194370
http://www.ariva.de/forum/...3906-News-364286?page=7778#jumppos194455
http://www.ariva.de/forum/...s-Corp-News-461347?page=854#jumppos21354
Um so erstaunlicher ist der Kurssprung von gestern.
Auch die Lobbyisten wollen mehr Geld, 9.5 Millionen Euro sind ihnen zu wenig.
www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/banken/...gleich/9462294.html
JPMorgan muss wohl nachbessern, der Vergleich scheint zu hinken.
Auch die Lobbyisten wollen mehr Geld, 9.5 Millionen Euro sind ihnen zu wenig.
www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/banken/...gleich/9462294.html
JPMorgan muss wohl nachbessern, der Vergleich scheint zu hinken.
Wo Angst herrscht verkriecht sich die Vernunft.
Ich kann nicht verstehen wie man einen solchen Müll erzählen kann und das auch noch selber glaubt !!!
Sind nur 15 Mio $, verglichen mit WMIH's MK von 500 Mio $ reiner Peanuts. Da wird ja nicht mal eine Maus von satt, die kleine Spende ans US-Finanzamt können wir noch verschmerzen...
Ich freue mich erstmal über den Kurs...
Grüße
kroetedetektor
Ich freue mich erstmal über den Kurs...
Grüße
kroetedetektor
|
Neueste Beiträge aus dem Mr. Cooper Group Inc. Forum
| Wertung | Antworten | Thema | Verfasser | letzter Verfasser | letzter Beitrag | |
60 | 67.417 | Coop SK Tippspiel (ehem. WMIH) | ranger100 | Terminator100 | 20:40 | |
| 8 | 1.307 | WMIH + Cooper Info | Orakel99 | lander | 16:17 | |
| 46 | 13.487 | █ Der ESCROW - Thread █ | union | sonifaris | 18.04.24 10:37 | |
| 162 | 86.761 | COOP News (ehemals: Wamu /WMIH) | Pjöngjang | noenough | 21.03.24 17:04 | |
| 349 | 198.955 | Wamu WKN 893906 News ! | plusquamperfekt | union | 10.03.24 17:21 |
