Wer weiss, war da vorhin vielleicht etwas vorreilig. Leicht moeglich das die vorbereitet sind. Ueberbewerten wuerde Ich das allerdings erstmal auch nicht.Soweit Ich mich erinnern kann, sind wir bei der OTC in einem Bereich, in dem keine Standards noetig sind, und es wird vor Buden in diesem Seqment gewarnt.
Faster, weisst du da mehr ?
We want and will sue you Mr Willingham and other Board members for ...
We will sue you Mr Willingham and other BOD members for cheating and publishing and Misinforming the Shareholders and the small retail shareholders and will request and ask the SEC to start a Investigation on behalve of a small Group of Shareholders (72 right now) for trying to profit and in collaboration with some groups of individuals trying to take from their rights of having a profit on based Falce Acountign numbers and not reporting a adecuately to the SEC and the Public in the Last Official 10K.On the date of 5 April a letter as first step will put orward to the SEC office asking to bring fraud charges of behave of this group if there aren't made the right adjustments to the last 10K till that Date publicly.We deserve the right to go in the court of Law and a Lawyer will come forward to the SEC to take contacts to the represantives of this Oficcialy registered Company without the posibility to be contact from their Parties in interests.We will demand from the SEC a thorough investigation on the Atempts made from the BOD to maliciously Hide and misreport the Oficial as Requested from the SEC the Annual Filling of the 10K which was full failure on the behave of the WAMU BOD.If the Hiden assets arent going to be shown as it is normally we will bring charges against the BOD for RICO Charges in conection with groups r individuals in atempt to steal from their owners assets and deposits.You have to Disclose all the List of assets left from the BK Exit owned from the WMIH.Here are included any deposits larger than 25M$ and any cash reserve deposited under the ownership of the WMIH,Any title of Bonds owned from the WMIH or one of their Subs.The amount of the total of the Morgages and Loans under the WMIH or one of their subs.Any distribution made from the Subs to the Parent in the last year.We will go ahead with our charges if the proper changes aren't make in the next two weeks.We have all the will and the right and the facts to base and prove our allegations
Also grob , Sie waeren ne kleine Gruppe (72 Mitglieder) Sie sagen , das Willy und das BOD die kleinen Shareholder verscheissern..... betruegen wuerden.
Es waeren da einige Werte, Konten, im Q10 nicht richtig aufgefuehrt.
Sie wuerden , als ersten Schritt, falls das Q10 nicht richtig korrigiert wuerde, am 5 April eine Antrag, Anfrage ans SEC stellen , das zu untersuchen.
Sie wuerden sich vorbehalten einen vor ein Gericht zu gehen, und ein Anwalt wuerde
sich bei der SEC melden, um Kontakt mit den Representanten einer officiell eingetragenen Firma , die es nicht moeglich macht, das Beteiligte (Wir) mit Ihnen in Kontakt treten, Kontakt aufzunehmen. ( Hat da nicht einer mal gemeint, er haette saemtliche gepostete Nummern angerufen, und nicht ein Anschluss haette funktioniert? )
Dann kommen noch ein paar Vorwuerfe gegen das BOD und Willi.
Sie enden mit
Wir haben alle den Willen und das Recht und die Fakten um unsere Vorwuerefe
zu beweisen/belegen
He, he.......egal, auf jeden Fall ham wa wieda ma ne neue Timeline,
Das hier ist vom Juni 2012.
Da ist der Altini, der das gestern gepostet hat, auch dabei......und Faster.
http://www.ariva.de/forum/...s-Corp-News-461347?page=173#jump13715886waswesichxx: Hmmm, Hmmmm, Hmmmm 28 28.06.12 23:25 #4345
Yippieeeeee, he, he, he
Da machen sich ein paar Gedanken ne neue Shareholder Gruppe zu formieren, nen Anwalt einzuschalten. Sind sich aber nicht ganz einig. Einer moechte nur mehr transparenz , (flowlogic) der neuen WMI erreichen, hat auch schon nen Anwaltsvorschlag. Faster redet von Klagen (er hatt fuer seine Commons nicht released.) Natuerlich gibt es Stimmen dagegen.....was wollt Ihr denn , Ihr habt releases erteilt.
Na ja, Ich denke ja eher das dass eher ne Reaktion auf die newslose , langweilige Zeit ist. Ob da wirklich was passiert......hmmmmm
Auf jeden Fall mehr los als hier.
Hier mal der Diskussionsverlauf
New SHAREHOLDERS Group SHould be formed 28-Jun-12 03:06 pm
flowlogic6
I strongly believe that a new sharehoders groupd should be formed.The present board or previous board or EC or the debtor's counsel or EC's counsel no one bothered to inform shareholders about the assets, liabilities and what each shareholder is receiving or received.May be about time to form a new group and the POR should be challenged.
PS: Present board members it is time to share with the shareholders what your plans are and what we received other than the symbol change
----------------------
old_joe_mcc
flow,...what we received other than the symbol change...
YooHooHoo won't let me post what else we received, nor what we expect to receive.
---------------------------------
altini_k1
I am Inn.
-------------------------------
flowlogic6
I am looking for one of the best attroney's who brought case against BAC and got atleast 8B in settlement.She is from NY and i think we should approach her as a group.Waiting for four years and these guys are not at all bothered to release any information to shareholders.If we can step up, we should be able to stop this circus atleast now.
-----------------------------------
altini_k1
I Thik is worth it knowing what kind of evil people we got to fight against and were to fight for our interesses.LEts get started.Sooner we get and better it is for all the WAMUers.Thanks for everything you do Brother.
--------------------------
flowlogic6
Debtors and EC should be answerable whether they looked at complete PAA, not just the 40 page document.
------------------------------
kbrocks80
Its a secrete sweet deal done between JPM/FDIC........WHY WOULD THEY SHOW IT?
where is wikileaks when you need them...lol
---------------------------
kbrocks80
I am also all for it, but i think we just need a little more time..maybe by august
but the ideas and information we can start gathering now.
---------------------------
flowlogic6
Remember EC's letter to shareholders..... there were some negotiations happened and the contents were privileged information not to reveal to shareholders?.Sounds like a biggest financial scam on earth ever happened.How is it transparent when you do not want to share with the shareholders, the rightful owners of the company now and then?.
----------------------------------------
gwanbakhom
Flow, who are you planning to sue and under what legal grounds?
-------------------------------
kbrocks80
why do you care...your second post ever..lol
Flow, I think that you are being too radical when you propose, "She is from NY and i think we should approach her as a group"
---------------------------
gwanbakhom
Keep in mind that we are all just message board posters and aren't really willing to leave the comfort of our computer chair to go out and actually do something. When you come up with such radical thoughts all I can say to you is ,"Whoa Nellie" back to the barn with you.
------------------------------
gwanbakhom
Kbrocks, it's just a legitimate question. You're getting everyone worked up about a lawsuit; so the obvious questions would be, " Who are you planning on suing and on what legal grounds are you suing?"
-----------------------------------------
gwanbakhom
"Its a secrete sweet deal done between JPM/FDIC"
If that's the case, why did you sign the releases that freed JPM/FDIC from lawsuits?
-----------------------------------------
flowlogic6
Did i ever say i would sue anyone?.I am asking for transparency and what did i get for my old shares in $value,not the symbol change.Who i should sue?.That is the reason to search for a better lawyer who can give the options to shareholders like me who waited for years and still see no reasonable answers, atleast the asset list.
------------------------------------------
gwanbakhom
Kbrocks, you do realize that when you signed the releases for JPM/FDIC, that you were signing a legal and binding contract.
You can't sign something like that and then a few months later say, "Well, I've changed my mind and I want to sue JPM/FDIC." The legal system doesn't work like that.
--------------------------------------------
flowlogic6
The same legal system tells that, the EC and directors have fuduciary responsibilities towards shareholders.And by the way, this is the lawyer i was talking about.
The Lawyer Behind the Bank of America Settlement
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/06/29/t...------------------------------
kbrocks80
Ohhh Really!!
there is always a loophole...you be surprised what can be done.
My question was WHY DO YOU CARE?
--------------------------------
gwanbakhom
"The Lawyer Behind the Bank of America Settlement"
So, Flow, have you established initial contact with this lawyer yet? Wouldn't it be funny if this lawyer turns out to be Bopfan herself, that would be a hoot and a half.
Flow, please contact this attorney, post haste, and let us know the results of your conversation. TIA Bro!
---------------------------------------
altini_k1
user gwenstefani was added to my ignore list.Flow don't feed the animals in the Zoo.Let them feed on each other.
--------------------------------------
much.faster
for example:bancrupcy fraud - the split of the taxrefunds when they were due to wmi losses
bancrupcy and securioties fraud - look at the shareholderlist, and add them, you will know, what rosen, wal rat aand the others had to hide
only on the fly, and i bet, jberg and others could add some more ...
well, id did sign the releases for the wahuqs, and got no money for them until now. so maybe i can take back the releases, lol.
---------------------------------
much.faster
and, i did not sign any releases for my commons.
and whom would i sue?
lets start with jpm, fdic, the marat crook like richard daley, the alan fishman gang with frank baier, the prejudiced judges like "case is closed" collyer, "jpm would go bancrupt, if they had to pay back the money" wal rat, the politicians, like carl "bad loan" levin and tom coburn, who lied about the wamu loans, goldman sucks, who mad a contract with wamu, and told their other clients to sell or short wamu, banco santander, who made an illegal and criminal cartell with jpm and made sham negotiations with wamu during the last days.
and thats onlky for starters, i missed a lot, lol.
mal sehen was die WO Jungs dazu sagen, koennt lustig werden
Lg